AI answer monitoring · sampled via API across 3 models
AnswerRank samples the questions your buyers ask, stores every answer word for word, and sends you three things to fix. Monday morning, doable by Friday.
Scans are not open yet, and this page has no form on it. Sampled via API across 3 models. Not affiliated with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or Perplexity.
? best CRM for design agencies
? CRM with a client portal for a small agency
? Pipedrive alternatives for agencies
9 of 9 answers returned_
| Pipedrive | 5 of 9 | 56% |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | 5 of 9 | 56% |
| Copper | 2 of 9 | 22% |
| Acme — you | 2 of 9 | 22% |
The blind spot
There is no rank to check
The answer is generated once, for one person, and then it is gone.
No referrer arrives in analytics
The buyer who was told about someone else never visited your site at all.
Your SEO suite cannot see it
Search Console, Semrush and Ahrefs read result pages. This was not a result page.
So you hear it by accident
A prospect mentions, months later, that an assistant suggested your competitor.
How it will work
The things a buyer actually types into an assistant. Written from your own site, editable in one screen.
Sampled through our own metered API gateway. Every answer stored verbatim, with its date and the question that produced it.
The share of answers naming you, who was named instead, and the movement since last Monday, signed in points.
Read out of the answers where a competitor won. Each task quotes the sentence that justifies it.
Target time to first value: under 2 minutes to a score, under 6 minutes to the first task. No signup, no card, no call.
Work order · week of 24 Aug · example
This is the deliverable. Not a chart of your visibility over time, not a table of questions to interpret alone. A short list of work, ordered, with the evidence attached.
Pipedrive was named in 5 of 9 answers. In 3 of them the model reached for a page comparing the two, and yours does not exist.
“For a design agency I would look at Pipedrive first — its pipeline view maps cleanly onto client projects.”
Two models described the portal as a paid add-on. Your pricing page lists it under Pro without saying it is included.
“Acme has a client portal, though I believe it is a paid add-on rather than part of the base plan.”
Both models named the same two roundups as claimed sources. Neither roundup includes you.
“Most agency-focused roundups put Pipedrive, HubSpot and Copper at the top of the list.”
+11 pts is what next Monday says about the three above.
The score exists to prove the tasks worked.

Why this and not a dashboard
Every other tool stops here
A dashboard of questions, mention rates and share-of-voice charts, handed to a marketer with eleven other jobs. Measuring is the easy half.
We start here
Publish this page. Fix this claim. Get named in this roundup. A chart is easy to stop opening. A list that visibly moved your number is not.
Passes
The 3-question scan is free and needs no email. Passes go on sale when the first scan runs. Nothing on this page takes a card, and neither price here is a placeholder.
What we do not claim
We sample answers. We do not rank them.
There is no ranking to report. We ask each question a fixed number of times through an API and count the names that come back, with the denominator always shown.
No partnership with any model provider.
Not with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or Perplexity. Not implied on any surface, ever. We are a customer of their APIs, the same as anyone.
Sources are claimed, not verified.
When a model names a source inside its own answer we report it as a claimed source. We do not call it a citation until we can verify it.
Every figure on this page is an example.
Acme is not a customer. We have none yet, so there are no testimonials, no logos and no case studies here — and we will not write ones we were not given.
Scans open shortly. Until then the only thing here is an address, with a person on the other end of it.